AWDTSG Removal Ontario — Province-Wide Takedowns of Are We Dating The Same Guy Posts

A post in an Are We Dating The Same Guy group can reach tens of thousands of people in a single afternoon. In Ontario, where the Toronto group alone draws members from across the Greater Toronto Area, a screenshot of your dating profile alongside an allegation you have never had the chance to answer can circulate faster than anyone can respond to it. Employers see it. Colleagues see it. People you have never met form a view of you before you know the post exists.

MGMT Reputation handles AWDTSG post removal for clients across Ontario. We work confidentially, we work from evidence, and we work through the platform’s own reporting and escalation processes rather than through public confrontation. Our team operates from five offices across North America, including our St. Catharines location in the Niagara region, which means Ontario clients deal with people working in their own time zone and under their own legal framework.

500+

Reviews Removed

90%+

Success Rate

24/7

Support Available

100%

Confidential

AWDTSG REMOVAL ONTARIO: SCANS AND TAKEDOWNS, START TO FINISH

Most people who contact us have seen one post. They rarely know whether it is the only one.

Ontario is covered by nine overlapping AWDTSG groups, and content moves between them. A post that originates in the Toronto group is frequently screenshotted and reposted in regional groups, in national groups, and occasionally on entirely separate platforms. Removing the original while leaving five copies in place accomplishes very little.

Our process starts with a full scan before any takedown is submitted. We identify every instance we can locate across the group network, document each one, and then submit them as a coordinated set. That sequencing matters: submitting individually, over days or weeks, tends to produce inconsistent outcomes, while a single documented submission covering every instance is treated as one coherent complaint.

Where a post has spread beyond the AWDTSG network entirely — onto screenshot aggregation accounts, forums, or other social platforms — we handle those through our social media takedown service, which runs on the same evidence package.

AWDTSG REMOVAL ONTARIO: EVERY GROUP WE COVER

Ontario is served by nine official AWDTSG groups, organised by region rather than by single city. We cover all of them:

Toronto / Mississauga — the largest by a wide margin, drawing members from across the GTA
Ottawa / Kingston / Cornwall — Eastern Ontario
Hamilton / Burlington / Oakville — the western GTA and Golden Horseshoe
Niagara Falls / St. Catharines — Niagara region
Kitchener / Guelph / Brantford — the Waterloo region corridor

Two points matter here that most people are not aware of.

First, there is no official group covering Windsor and Essex County. The AWDTSG network’s own guidance is that people join the group for the nearest city where theirs is not listed, which in practice means Windsor-area posts appear in the London or Toronto groups. If you live in Windsor and have concluded that no group covers you, that is not correct — and searching only for a Windsor group is why some posts go undiscovered for months.

Second, alongside the official groups there are a large number of imposter groups using the AWDTSG name and branding without operating under its policies. This is acknowledged by the network itself. Imposter groups matter for removal because they do not follow the official moderation rules, which changes both how a takedown is framed and how likely a first submission is to succeed. Establishing which type of group a post is actually sitting in is part of our initial scan.

HOW TO FIND OUT IF YOU ARE POSTED IN AN ONTARIO GROUP

Most men never see the post. The groups are private and admitted to women only, which means the person being discussed is structurally the last to know. People typically find out one of three ways: a friend tells them, a match mentions it, or a conversation goes cold for reasons that only make sense later.

That leaves a lot of people in the worst position — suspecting something exists, unable to confirm it, and with nine separate Ontario groups it could be sitting in.

You cannot check this yourself. Creating a false profile to gain entry breaches the platform’s terms, is grounds for removal of your account, and would undermine any subsequent takedown submission you make. Asking a female friend to look is the common workaround, and it fails more often than it works: a single search in one group misses reposts, and most people do not know which of the nine regions their post would have landed in.

Our AWDTSG checker and search service handles this properly. We scan the Ontario group network and report back what exists, where it sits, and how far it has spread. If nothing is there, you get that answer and nothing further happens.

Knowing is not the same as acting. Plenty of clients run a scan, find a single low-visibility post, and decide to leave it. That is a legitimate outcome and we will tell you when we think it is the right one.

HOW AWDTSG REMOVAL WORKS FOR ONTARIO CLIENTS

Our removal process for New York clients is the same proven system we run nationally, with legal framing adjusted for New York State statute where the case supports it. Most AWDTSG removals are completed within 72 hours from the moment we have the evidence we need.

Confidential intake

We start with a conversation, not a form. You tell us what you have found, when you found it, and what you are most worried about. Nothing you share is disclosed to anyone outside our team, and we do not contact the poster, the group admins, or anyone in your personal or professional life at this stage or any other.

Evidence package

We build a documented record of every instance: the post, the group, the date, the visible reach, and the specific content at issue. This is the foundation for everything that follows, and it is also what makes the difference between a report that gets actioned and one that gets dismissed. Where the post contains photographs of you, we assess whether copyright provides an additional route — you own the copyright in most photographs you have taken of yourself, which we cover under image copyright protection.

Takedown submission

We submit through the platform’s reporting channels, framed against the specific policy provisions the content breaches. Framing matters more than volume here. A submission that identifies the precise policy violation and evidences it is handled differently from a general complaint.

Platform escalation

Initial reports are frequently reviewed automatically. Where an initial submission is rejected or goes unanswered, we escalate through secondary channels with additional documentation. This is the stage where most self-managed attempts stall, and it is where the majority of our work happens.

Mirror sweep

After removal, we re-scan the group network for reposts and mirrors as part of the removal work. Content that has been removed once is sometimes reposted by a different member, and the window immediately following a takedown is when that is most likely.

Post-removal monitoring

When the matter closes we give you the full documented record of what was found, what was submitted and what was removed. If you want continued watching of the group network beyond that point, AWDTSG monitoring is a separate service and is priced separately.

Most cases see an initial platform response within 72 hours of submission. Outcomes depend on the specific content and the platform’s assessment of it, and we will tell you honestly at intake how we rate your particular situation rather than promising an outcome we cannot control.

ONTARIO AND CANADIAN LAW AND AWDTSG CONTENT

Canadian law approaches this differently from US state law, and the differences work in a claimant’s favour more often than people expect. The following is general information, not legal advice, and we are not a law firm — but understanding which of these applies to your situation shapes how a takedown is framed.

Criminal Code of Canada, s. 162.1 — Publication of an Intimate Image Without Consent

Section 162.1 was added to the Criminal Code in 2015 through the Protecting Canadians from Online Crime Act. It makes it an offence to knowingly publish, distribute, transmit, sell, make available or advertise an intimate image of a person, knowing that the person did not consent, or being reckless as to whether they consented. It is a hybrid offence, prosecutable by summary conviction or indictment.

The provision matters enormously — but it is narrower than most people assume, and we would rather be straight with you about that. An “intimate image” means a visual recording engaging the subject’s reasonable expectation of privacy, typically depicting nudity or explicit sexual activity. It does not cover unflattering or embarrassing photographs. The typical AWDTSG post — a dating profile screenshot alongside written allegations — falls outside s. 162.1 entirely. Where a post does include an intimate image, s. 162.1 becomes one of the strongest levers available anywhere in North America, and the associated provisions permit courts to order removal of such images from the internet.

Reference: Criminal Code, s. 162.1 (Justice Laws Canada)

Public Disclosure of Private Facts — Jane Doe 72511 v. Morgan, 2018 ONSC 6607

This is the provision most relevant to the ordinary AWDTSG post, and it is a genuine Ontario advantage.

In November 2018, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice recognised the tort of public disclosure of private facts. The elements a claimant must establish are: that the defendant publicised an aspect of the claimant’s private life; that the claimant did not consent; that the matter publicised would be highly offensive to a reasonable person in the claimant’s position; and that the publication was not of legitimate concern to the public.

The court awarded $100,000 in damages for the privacy breach in that case. The significance for AWDTSG situations is that this tort does not require the content to be an intimate image, and it does not require the content to be false — private facts can be true and still actionable. That is a meaningfully different position from most US states.

Reference: Jane Doe 72511 v. Morgan, 2018 ONSC 6607 (CanLII)

Intrusion Upon Seclusion — Jones v. Tsige, 2012 ONCA 32

The Ontario Court of Appeal recognised intrusion upon seclusion in 2012, holding that a person who intentionally intrudes upon the seclusion of another or their private affairs is liable where the invasion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.

Where an AWDTSG post is built on information obtained by accessing accounts, messages, or records the poster had no right to see — which is more common than it sounds — this is the applicable framework rather than the disclosure tort.

Reference: Jones v. Tsige, 2012 ONCA 32 (CanLII)

Defamation in Ontario — Limitation Periods and Anti-SLAPP

Where a post makes false factual allegations, ordinary defamation principles apply. Two procedural points are worth knowing.

First, on timing: the shortened notice provisions in the Libel and Slander Act — six weeks’ notice under s. 5(1), three months to commence under s. 6 — apply to newspapers and broadcasts. The Ontario Superior Court declined to extend s. 5(1) to social media posts in Levant v. Day, 2017 ONSC 5956. For a Facebook post, the general two-year limitation period from discovery applies instead. That gives considerably more room than most people assume, but it is not unlimited, and evidence degrades long before the limitation period expires.

Second, on risk: s. 137.1 of the Courts of Justice Act allows a defendant to bring an early anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss where the expression relates to a matter of public interest, with significant costs consequences if it succeeds. This is why we treat litigation as a last resort rather than a first move, and why platform-side removal is almost always the faster, cheaper and lower-risk route.

Reference: Libel and Slander Act, RSO 1990, c L.12

AWDTSG REMOVAL ONTARIO: INDUSTRIES MOST AFFECTED BY EXPOSURE

Certain professions carry disproportionate exposure, either because clients search before engaging or because regulators and employers monitor conduct.

Ontario's regulated professions sit at the top of that list. Physicians, dentists, lawyers, accountants and engineers all operate under governing bodies where a complaint can trigger a process regardless of merit. Financial services professionals in Toronto's downtown core face similar scrutiny, with compliance functions increasingly running open-source checks on staff.

Beyond the regulated professions, the pattern is consistent across teaching and education, healthcare, real estate, hospitality and skilled trades — any field where individual reputation drives referrals, and where a prospective client's first action is a search. Ontario's technology sector, particularly in the Toronto–Waterloo corridor, has its own version of the problem: small, densely networked communities where a single post circulates through professional circles within days.

ONTARIO CITIES AND REGIONS WE COVER

Greater Toronto Area

Toronto, Mississauga, Brampton, Markham, Vaughan, Richmond Hill, Oakville and Burlington. The GTA generates the majority of our Ontario caseload, which reflects both population and the concentration of AWDTSG group activity.

Ottawa and Eastern Ontario

Ottawa, Kingston, Cornwall and the eastern counties. Ottawa’s public service and defence workforce brings additional considerations around security clearance and employment screening that we handle regularly.

Hamilton and Niagara

Hamilton, Burlington, Oakville, St. Catharines, Niagara Falls and Welland. Our St. Catharines office sits in this region.

London and Southwestern Ontario

London, St Thomas, Strathroy and Sarnia, including the student population associated with Western University.

Kitchener–Waterloo, Guelph and Brantford

Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge, Guelph and Brantford. A concentrated technology and post-secondary corridor where professional networks overlap heavily.

Durham and Central Ontario

Oshawa, Whitby, Peterborough, Cobourg, Barrie, Orillia and Collingwood. Two groups cover this area between them.

Windsor–Essex

Windsor, Leamington and Essex County. No official AWDTSG group covers Windsor directly, so content about Windsor residents typically surfaces in the London or Toronto groups instead. Proximity to Detroit also means posts occasionally cross into the Michigan groups, which requires scanning both sides of the border.

Northern Ontario

Sudbury, North Bay, Sault Ste Marie, Thunder Bay and Timmins. Smaller communities where a post reaches a far higher proportion of the people someone actually knows — the reach is lower, the impact is often greater.

Province-Wide Remote Service

Our entire process runs remotely and confidentially. There is no requirement to attend an office anywhere, and clients in communities not listed above receive identical service.

ONGOING AWDTSG MONITORING FOR ONTARIO CLIENTS

Removal addresses what exists today. Monitoring addresses what appears next.

Reposting is most likely in the weeks immediately following a takedown, particularly where a post was shared by several members rather than one. Clients who want the group network watched on a continuing basis — most commonly those in regulated professions — take out ongoing monitoring, which scans on a recurring schedule and flags content before it has time to circulate.

This is a separate paid service, not part of a removal engagement. For coverage details and package options, see our AWDTSG monitoring page.

AWDTSG REMOVAL PRICING FOR ONTARIO CLIENTS

We publish our pricing rather than hiding it behind a call. Removal work, evidence and post video access, photo copyright registration and ongoing monitoring are all listed on our AWDTSG removal pricing page.

All prices shown are in US dollars. Ontario clients pay the listed USD amount, and your card issuer applies the exchange rate at the time of payment — there is no separate Canadian rate and no surcharge for being outside the US.

If your situation involves multiple posts across several groups, we will quote it at consultation rather than asking you to work it out from the list.

WHY ONTARIO CLIENTS CHOOSE MGMT REPUTATION

We are not a law firm and we do not pretend to be one. What we do is the operational work of getting content removed: locating every instance, documenting it properly, framing the submission against the right policy provisions, and escalating when the first attempt fails.

Three things distinguish how we handle Ontario matters. We work under Canadian law rather than applying a US framework to a Canadian situation — the disclosure tort recognised in Jane Doe 72511 is a materially different instrument from anything most US states offer, and it changes how a case is framed. We have a physical presence in the province. And we tell clients at intake what we assess their realistic prospects to be, including when we think the answer is difficult, because the alternative is taking money for work we do not expect to succeed.

Every matter is handled confidentially. We do not publish client names, we do not use cases as examples, and we do not contact anyone in your life without your explicit instruction.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

AWDTSG Removal and Scans in Ontario

How do I find out if I am posted at all?

You cannot check the groups yourself — they are private and women-only. Our checker service scans the Ontario group network and reports what exists. If nothing is there, that is the answer, and there is no obligation to go further.

Can you remove an AWDTSG post about me in Ontario?

We can pursue removal, and in the majority of cases we achieve it. We do not guarantee outcomes, because the final decision sits with the platform rather than with us. At intake we will tell you honestly how we rate your specific situation.

How long does AWDTSG removal take?

Most cases see an initial platform response within 72 hours of submission. Matters requiring escalation take longer. We keep you updated at each stage rather than leaving you to wonder.

Will the poster know I contacted you?

No. We do not contact the poster, the group administrators, or anyone connected to you. Our work runs through platform reporting channels.

What happens if the post reappears later?

Reposting after removal does happen. Continued watching of the group network is available through our monitoring service, which is priced separately from removal.

Does it matter that the post is true?

Not necessarily. The Ontario tort of public disclosure of private facts can apply to true information, provided the other elements are met. Truth is a defence to defamation, but it is not a defence to every claim.

Do I need a lawyer?

Usually not. Most matters resolve through platform removal without litigation, which is faster and considerably cheaper. Where a legal route is worth considering, we will say so and you can take independent advice.

Do you handle cases outside Ontario?

Yes. We cover every Canadian province and all fifty US states.

BOOK A CONFIDENTIAL ONTARIO AWDTSG CONSULTATION

Tell us what you have found. We will scan for everything else, tell you what we assess is achievable, and set out what it costs before you commit to anything.